Lump Sum vs Dollar-Cost Averaging

You've got a pile of cash. All in today, or a slice each month? Simulate both, month by month — then throw a market crash at them and see which strategy survives it.

Your inputs

$
%
%
Lump sum final
—
all in on day one
DCA final
—
dripped in monthly
Difference
—
Verdict—

Balance trajectories

Lump sum Dollar-cost averaging

The core question

A bonus, an inheritance, a house sale — money arrives in a lump, and you have two honest options. Lump sum puts it all to work immediately. Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) feeds it in over months, buying at whatever prices show up along the way. The math question is simple: which ends up with more?

Why lump sum usually wins

Markets rise more often than they fall, so the expected return of any invested dollar is positive — which means time in the market is the whole game. Every month your cash sits on the sidelines waiting its turn is a month it isn't compounding. Vanguard's well-known study of this exact question found lump sum beat DCA roughly two-thirds of the time across markets and history. DCA isn't return maximization; it's regret insurance.

Each month: lump sum balance × (1 + r/12), all of it working
DCA: only the invested tranches work — the rest waits its turn

The one scenario where DCA wins: the shock

Set the market shock to −30% at month 6 and watch the verdict flip. A crash punishes money that's already invested and spares money still in cash — so the strategy with cash on the sidelines when the drop hits comes out ahead. That's the entire bull case for DCA: not higher returns, but a softer landing if the worst happens early. The shock input lets you price that insurance policy.

Worked example

$120,000, dripped over 12 months, 7% expected return, no shock. Lump sum finishes at roughly $128,675; DCA at $123,926 — a $4,749 gap, about 3.8%, bought purely by twelve extra months of compounding on the full amount. Add a −30% shock at month 6 and DCA wins by roughly $14,940 instead. Same inputs, opposite answer — the crash is everything.

Caveats worth knowing

Educational purposes only — not financial advice. Projections are hypothetical and don't predict actual investment returns.